Most companies skip straight to building. Do you know what you're building on?
Run the Data Assessor
MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR DIVERSIFIED HOLDING GROUP / FINANCE

Consolidated P&L reporting across four companies in under two months.

Each of the four operating companies ran its own P&L and ERP, with no single system for consolidated reporting. Consolidating and reconciling the four companies' monthly financial results took most of each month. PivotX built a working reconciliation foundation in under two weeks, covering business requirements, data consolidation, automated reconciliation, governance, and self-service reporting.

Industry

Diversified Holdings

Function

Finance

Entities

Four

Delivered In

Under two months

RESULTS

Automated data preparation

Normalization and transformation rules replaced manual extraction and code adjustments.

Faster consolidation

Automated aggregation improves comparison with the master file.

One reconciliation workflow

BigQuery replaced manual reconciliation across four ERP systems.

Four operating companies reconciled against a single master file, with Audit and other corporate functions asking to be onboarded next.

THE SITUATION

Four companies were closing their books across four separate systems.

Within one practice area of a group spanning hundreds of businesses, four operating companies each maintained their own P&L and ERP system. With no single system for consolidated reporting, the finance team spent most of each month consolidating and reconciling the results.

The work was also time-consuming and required teams to extract data and adjust codes manually while continuing to manage core financial operations.

01

Four operating companies, four separate ERP systems

02

No automated consolidation or ledger reconciliation

03

Codes readjusted manually for cross-entity consistency

04

Close absorbing most of the month, every month

THE WORK

What we built

01

Business requirements defined first

Before working with PivotX, the Finance team lacked a shared definition of the reconciliation and variance questions the new system needed to answer.

PivotX worked with Finance and other stakeholders to define the expected outcomes before engineering began. The first phase focused on reconciliation and variance analysis across four operating companies.

The focused scope gave the team clear requirements and a practical place to begin.

02

The approach tested on actual financial data

Before working with PivotX, teams could not automatically compare company-level results with the consolidated master file. Gap analysis and reconciliation remained manual.

PivotX built a prototype using the companies' actual financial data. The team transformed and consolidated the data, tested automatic comparisons with the master file, and identified discrepancies early.

The prototype validated the approach in under two weeks and gave the team greater confidence in its month-to-month comparisons.

03

A repeatable reconciliation pipeline

The prototype demonstrated that automated reconciliation could work, but the source files still needed a permanent home and a repeatable processing system.

PivotX built a Google Cloud data foundation that brings together files from Oracle and the master financial system and automatically runs the reconciliation process.

The organization gained a data foundation it owns in under two months. The resulting analysis now informs its biannual planning cycle.

04

Governance built into the data foundation

The new finance system needed clear controls for managing data quality, monitoring performance, and supporting additional business functions.

PivotX added data-governance standards, monitoring, and a data catalog to the new infrastructure. The company is also considering an interface that would allow Finance to add new codes and entities without engineering support.

Finance was the first function to use the foundation. Audit and other corporate teams have since asked to be added.

WHERE THIS TRANSFERS

Where this applies

01

Separate business units run separate systems, and reconciling them is somebody's manual job every month.

02

Your close consumes the time your finance team should be spending on analysis.

03

Previous attempts stalled because the programme tried to solve everything before delivering anything.

Which procurement workflow is creating the longest delay?

We can review the manual steps, handoffs, and systems involved and identify a practical place to begin.